Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


What are FSC Cigarettes?


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-24-2013, 06:56 AM
masklofumanto's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: U.S.A. (NYC metro area)
Posts: 7,852
Rep Power: 796
masklofumanto is just really nicemasklofumanto is just really nicemasklofumanto is just really nicemasklofumanto is just really nice
Default

Originally Posted by jrjim View Post
I couldn't agree more. Well this FSC is an innovative idea but my worry just like smilin is that the chemicals that cigarette smokers have to inhale due to the cigarette's fire-retardant properties is causing an alarm on my part.
If you are that concerned about the chemicals used in FSC cigarettes, there are a couple of things you could do. You could buy cigarettes from international online shops carrying cigarettes made in countries where the cigarettes are still non-FSC. Or, I think a better idea, you could make your own cigarettes with loose tobacco and filter tubes. The filter tubes used for making your own are not FSC. Of course, you will need a cigarette making machine. If you decide to take that route, don't get an auger-style ("corkscrew") electric machine: cigarettes made with them frequently have problems with the ember dropping off. Check out the RYO forum here for ideas and information, you'll find it very helpful.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2014, 10:24 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 75
Rep Power: 0
f.virtue is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Just another chemical to add to the myriad of others . The only benefit I can se is preventing people from falling asleep and burning down there house or starting forest fires by flicking out the car window !
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2014, 02:10 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 0
Taajsgpm is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I agree God only knows whats in those fire retardant chemicals I bet it aint good OMG what will they try to kill us with next. they tried that in the 70s and th ecost was extreme so the tobacco companies squashed it it would have saved many many lives there is a documentary on it somewhere
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11-27-2014, 01:37 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Greece
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 0
kinixecig is an unknown quantity at this point
Smile

[QUOTE=Sally;2148]I am no expert by any means but from the studies I have done I have found the following information on what is in so called fire-safe-cigarettes.

A fire-safe cigarette, also called "reduced ignition propensity" (RIP) cigarette has a reduced propensity to burn when left unattended. The most common fire-safe technology used by cigarette manufacturers is to wrap cigarettes with two or three thin bands of less-porous paper that act as "speed bumps". Fire safe cigarettes are made by adding bands of EVA (ethylene vinyl acetate) to the cigarette paper during manufacturing, in order to decrease burn rate at the bands. The combustion toxicity of EVA has not been studied to any extent, but combustion byproducts are known to include carbon monoxide and "unknown hydrocarbons".

Fire safe cigarettes have two layers of paper with %u201Cspeed bumps%u201D mixed with higher levels of chemicals than regular cigarettes. Such FSC cigarettes will burn out within one minute if the cigarette is not inhaled. The Citizens Against Fire Safe Cigarettes appeal to State/Commonwealth governments to review the facts and repeal the FSC laws. Failure to do so will result in increased health costs and deaths. If not repealed, the CAFSC will seek legal recourse through the judicial system and State Superior Courts. If necessary, the appeal will be made to the Supreme Court of the United States.

According to Citizens Against Fire Safe Cigarettes (CAFSC)


Author: David Jaromnak

Identified Hazards

1) Cigarette company literature and health officials have identified %u201Clight%u201D cigarettes as no less dangerous than regular cigarettes. Such light cigarettes contain equal amounts of carbon monoxide. The affect and harm of cigarette smoke varies depending upon the smoker%u2019s habit of taking longer, deeper and more frequent puffs on the cigarette. This is a widely accepted fact. Fire Safe Cigarettes require that a smoker inhale in less than one minute or the cigarette will extinguish itself. The need to keep a FSC cigarette burning increases the number of inhales per cigarette, and thus increases the amount of tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide intake into the smoker%u2019s lungs. The result is more health-risk damage to the smoker.

2) The Fire Safe Cigarette design has resulted in more frequent ash, which may fall and ignite more fires than regular cigarettes.

3) Having to relight cigarettes increases the potential for more fire related accidents with matches and lighters.

4) The added and higher level chemicals contained in FSC cigarettes has proven to be more toxic than regular cigarettes and cause increased health related problems for smokers. Symptoms/conditions include, but are not limited to: Nausea, Sores in mouth and throat, Dry throat, constant headaches, extreme coughing, tightness in the chest, vomiting, body aches, pain in the abdomen and respiratory conditions including asthma and bronchitis.

a. The Harvard School of Health reported that when comparing NY Cigarettes (FSC) versus Regular Cigarettes, the FSC cigarettes produced 13.9% more Naphthalene and 11.4% more carbon monoxide than regular cigarettes.[1] Naphthalene is commonly found in moth balls, and exposure in high amounts can result in %u201CSymptoms of acute exposure include headache, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, malaise, confusion, anemia, jaundice, convulsions, and coma.%u201D[2] Therefore, it has been proven that FSC cigarettes contain higher levels of chemicals that are harmful to smokers.

b. Phillip Morris USA has reported that the Adhesive ethylene vinyl acetate and polyvinyl acetate are used in the non-tobacco ingredients of cigarettes produced as a Side-seam adhesive. However, Phillip Morris USA fails to distinguish the differences in levels between regular and FSC cigarettes. The amount does not exceed .6 % combined.[3] Since additional layers of paper are used in FSC cigarettes, more adhesive is needed in the form of ethylene vinyl acetate.

Safe smoking habits of responsible adults prevent fatalities from burning cigarettes. It is up to individuals to responsibly extinguish cigarettes. The creation of FSC cigarettes has created numerous hazards which cause more fatalities and problems than the small amount of lives saved from fires with the FSC cigarettes in use. Not only are the FSC cigarettes unsafe to smokers, it presents health problems and increases the damage of cigarettes. Due to inadequate testing by Cigarette Companies and government agencies, the FSC cigarette poses real and identified dangers to the smoking public. Therefore, the FSC laws are detrimental to the public good and must be repealed immediately.

I hope this has helped to answer some of your questions. [/QUOT

Actually , I donot know even single thing about FSC but your first post is best for enchancing knowledge. But through this post i understand all the concept behind FSC.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 11-25-2017, 01:38 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 136
Rep Power: 0
hollynorth is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

A fire-safe cigarette has a reduced propensity to burn when left unattended. The most common fire-safe technology used by cigarette manufacturers is to wrap cigarettes with two or three thin bands of less-porous paper that act as “speed bumps” to slow down a burning cigarette. If a fire-safe cigarette is left unattended, the burning tobacco will reach one of these speed bumps and self-extinguish.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2019, 12:46 PM
Heike's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 258
Rep Power: 27
Heike is on a distinguished road
Default

FSC is yet another way of non-smokers telling us smokers what's good for us. The advent of FSC was the end of me parking my cigarette in an ashtray when I needed both hands; relights are annoying! Since FSC, once I've lit my cigarette, it stays between my fingers or gets parked between my lips until I'm done.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Cigreviews.com



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13