![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| in the UK, 100s are slightly less expensive than normal marlboros. more bang for your buck imo...well, were you can find them. |
| |||
| The difference in length is negligible at best. When you cut both of them apart at the filter the 100s have about 1/16th of an inch more tobacco than the Kings. Taste wise they are pretty much the same, but the Kings draw a lot better than the 100's do. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are Malboro Reds Buring Faster and contain less tobacoo? | patsaison | Off Topic - Talk About Anything You Want | 10 | 02-25-2012 07:13 PM |
| Kamel Reds | cooljay788 | Camel Cigarettes | 7 | 03-22-2011 07:48 PM |
| Marlboro Reds 100s | Frank | Marlboro Cigarettes | 5 | 12-23-2010 07:20 PM |
| Marlboro Select Blend Reds | gatrman56 | Marlboro Cigarettes | 0 | 11-06-2010 04:51 PM |
| Which are stronger? Camel Regulars or Marlboro Reds? | Wilted_Dahlia | General Smokers Discussion | 1 | 12-19-2009 05:48 AM |