[cooljay788]

I prefer smoking 100's. I get more tobacco and more drags for my money with smoking 100's.

Kings made a good "quick smoke." Like if you on a 5-10 min work break.

I've smoked 120s before. Max is the strongest 120 I have ever smoked. 120s used to be marketed towards dudes at first. So they really weren't a "women's cig" years ago.

I neva smoked Marlboro 72s. I've seen em though...they shorter than a king cig. And those cigs are a joke, based on the price for a Marlboro 72s pack.

[Rodwy]

While I've never smoked a filtered 72 I'm a big fan of unfiltered brands.

But when I do smoke filtered, I go for Kings.

[CamelMan324]

Originally Posted by cooljay788 I prefer smoking 100's. I get more tobacco and more drags for my money with smoking 100's. Kings made a good "quick smoke." Like if you on a 5-10 min work break. I've smoked 120s before. Max is the strongest 120 I have ever smoked. 120s used to be marketed towards dudes at first. So they really weren't a "women's cig" years ago. I neva smoked Marlboro 72s. I've seen em though...they shorter than a king cig. And those cigs are a joke, based on the price for a Marlboro 72s pack.

I like kings myself. I do like 100s though when I'm drinking because I love smoking when I'm hammered, lol. So I'll go 100 when I'm drunk so I can get more smoke and more drags. But on a regular day, I like Kings because I don't like to sit there for like 10-15 minutes smoking a long ass 100's cigarette.

[cooljay788]

Originally Posted by CamelMan324 I like kings myself. I do like 100s though when I'm drinking because I love smoking when I'm hammered, lol. So I'll go 100 when I'm drunk so I can get more smoke and more drags. But on a regular day, I like Kings because I don't like to sit there for like 10-15 minutes smoking a long ass 100's cigarette.

If it takes you more than 10 mins to smoke a 100, then eitha you a very slow smoker (the type who wants to enjoy and savor the cig instead of rushing to smoke), or the brand you smoke is a slow-burning brand.

Sometimes it takes me as lil as 7 mins to smoke a 100 cause I've been smoking 100s for most of my life as a smoker. LOL

Takes me 5 mins to smoke a King. That's too fast for me when it comes to smoking at home. At least with kings, I can chainsmoke 6-8 of those since they shorter-length cigs. But I'd also end up smoking more packs per day if I smoked the kings more often.

[barfly]

I smoke 100s most of the time. I order sampler cartons from native sites in King Size. I used to bum a 120 now and then when my mom was alive. Isn't Nat Sherman the one that has the 160s and the 180s?

[cooljay788]

I heard of Nat Shermans. But I recall otha smokers on the net (who are much older than me) saying Nat Shermans are no longa in production.

I believe the early 70s was the last time you could've smoked a 160 or a 180.

I saw pics of Nat Shermans online. They used to be colored cigs which was neat. But those would be too darn long for me to smoke.

[cooljay788]

If anyone wants to smoke 72s, be my guest. I sure would not as heck pay 8 bucks for a pack of Marlboro 72s in my town. That's a ripoff for a pack of 20 tiny cigs!

A pack of 72s should be more like 72 cents.

[Rodwy]

It's about $5.50 a pack where I live for Unfiltered, while Filtered is $4.50 a pack. To me the extra dollar is worth it.

[Max]

100's taste a lot worse for me. Probably just me, but I prefer Kings.

[cooljay788]

After I spent a couple of weeks smoking king-sized Native brands and this brand called Kick, I will admit kings taste stronger than 100's. I even notice Seneca Lights taste stronger in the king size instead of the 100 size.